However, I never seemed to have any inclination to the books or the movies, despite trying to read the first book and watching the first 3 movies with my friends.
I recall receiving flak for not enjoying fantasy enough and the feeling that one "lacks imagination" if they aren't into books like Lord of the Rings or Chronicles of Narnia.
Over the years, my love for books spanned to realistic fiction like T.C Boyle's Wild Child or memoirs like Angela's Ashes and mostly anecdotal/psychology based books like The Woman Who Changed Her Brain.
It wasn't until Boyle's Wild Child that I found comfort in the kind of books that I really am interested in.While authors of fantasy may be as creative and insightful as non-fiction ones, I feel that they have free reigns when it comes to creating stories, there's no limit or boundary ; one can fight dragons and save the world. There are morals and lessons and traces of human nature, but at large none of those things can really happen to you.
But when it comes to non-fiction, one has to convey a story that is just as gripping, intense and compelling whilst keeping it relatable and realistic as possible;stories that could happen to you or may have happened to those around you,or ones that you can learn from. I feel that fantasy authors have all the fruits in their basket to make fruit cake while authors of realistic fiction and non-fiction have only the basket to work with.





